Generative & Computational Design
Parametric workflows can compare structural and spatial options against defined cost, performance, and sustainability inputs before a project team selects a direction.
We research AI, automation, and reality-capture workflows around defined engineering problems. Any client use is governed by the project inputs, validation method, data rules, human review, and acceptance criteria.
Applied engineering R&D, focused on the problems that slow real projects down and the technology that removes them.
Parametric workflows can compare structural and spatial options against defined cost, performance, and sustainability inputs before a project team selects a direction.
Computer-vision experiments assist point-cloud and image classification for reality-capture workflows; model scope, LOD, tolerance, and human validation remain project-specific.
Rules and machine-learning experiments can assist the classification and prioritisation of coordination issues before an engineer reviews the proposed workflow.
In-house plugins and scripts support repetitive modelling, sheet setup, QA, and documentation tasks when they are validated for the project workflow.
Digital-twin pilots can connect approved sensor or IoT streams to asset models for operational review, subject to the client platform, data, and security requirements.
Data-model experiments support early review of project risk, quantities, and cost drivers while assumptions and engineering judgement remain visible.
Beyond services, we develop purpose-built software from concept and engineering through deployment, with product status and scope confirmed during evaluation.
An application developed to structure interiors mapping and measurement workflows for real-estate teams from approved project inputs.
A NeRF-based R&D engine for evaluating how approved drone footage can support 3D-mesh and digital-twin workflows.
A full-stack platform developed to coordinate large-scale mapping inputs, workflow stages, review, and output preparation.
A useful experiment becomes a controlled workflow only after its inputs, limitations, validation method, reviewer, and measurable outcome are defined.
Our lab pairs current AI with documented engineering controls: approved data handling, visible assumptions, named review, and human-led acceptance.
Experiments start with a defined delivery problem and are tested against an agreed workflow before client use is considered.
Approved tools, access, transfer, retention, confidentiality, and any restrictions on external model processing are documented for the engagement.
Automation supports named specialists; engineering judgement, review responsibility, and acceptance remain assigned to people.